4.7 Review

Butterflies in the gut: the interplay between intestinal microbiota and stress

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12929-023-00984-6

关键词

Gut-brain axis; Microbiota; Microbiome; Stress; Corticosterone; Intestinal steroidogenesis; Neural circuits; Autonomic nervous system; Probiotic; Prebiotic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Psychological stress is a global issue that affects a significant portion of the global population and increases the risk of psychiatric disorders. Recent evidence suggests that the gut microbiota plays a role in regulating stress and associated behavior. The microbiota can modulate stress response through the regulation of intestinal glucocorticoids and the autonomic nervous system. This review provides insight into the pathways by which gut microbes impact stress signaling, brain circuits, and ultimately the host's behavior.
Psychological stress is a global issue that affects at least one-third of the population worldwide and increases the risk of numerous psychiatric disorders. Accumulating evidence suggests that the gut and its inhabiting microbes may regulate stress and stress-associated behavioral abnormalities. Hence, the objective of this review is to explore the causal relationships between the gut microbiota, stress, and behavior. Dysbiosis of the microbiome after stress exposure indicated microbial adaption to stressors. Strikingly, the hyperactivated stress signaling found in microbiota-deficient rodents can be normalized by microbiota-based treatments, suggesting that gut microbiota can actively modify the stress response. Microbiota can regulate stress response via intestinal glucocorticoids or autonomic nervous system. Several studies suggest that gut bacteria are involved in the direct modulation of steroid synthesis and metabolism. This review provides recent discoveries on the pathways by which gut microbes affect stress signaling and brain circuits and ultimately impact the host's complex behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据