4.3 Article

Utilization of Quick Response Codes for Rapid Facilitator-Generated Feedback During Simulations in Nurse Practitioner Programs

期刊

CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101474

关键词

information technology; nursing informatics; QR codes; simulation education; standardization

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses QR code technology to standardize and streamline simulation performance feedback. The evaluation results are saved and transmitted through an electronic application, facilitating the standardization and dissemination of feedback. The analysis provides valuable longitudinal data for future simulations and educational engagement.
Background: Development and utilization of standardized processes is an essential best practice for simulation. This manuscript describes the use of quick response (QR) code technology to standardize and streamline facilitator-generated simulation performance feedback. Sample: The standardized evaluation was implemented with a single specialty cohort of forty-three students, with three evaluating faculty overseeing the simulations. The simulations took place over the course of one calendar year. Method: A standardized feedback evaluation was placed into a secured electronic application that saved each evaluation submitted and allowed for transmission and retrieval of the submissions. A QR code was placed in the physical simulation observation spaces and used by facilitators during the pilot. Results: The piloted process was successful in the program's standardization and dissemination of learner feedback. Analytics of the evaluation provides unique longitudinal data points that can inform future simulations and educational engagement. Conclusion: Using a QR code for simulation performance evaluation has promoted the ease and consistent use of an electronic feedback survey while providing new approaches to shape future learning opportunities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据