4.7 Article

A semi-Markovian approach to evaluate the availability of low voltage direct current systems with integrated battery storage

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109811

关键词

Low-voltage direct current (LVDC); Availability; Wear-out failure; Reliability; Semi-Markov; Multi-state system; Universal generating operator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a methodology for modeling the availability of low-voltage direct current (LVDC) systems with battery storage. It addresses the challenges posed by component failure, the presence of many components, and the addition of battery storage to the system. The methodology combines component reliability models, semi-Markov availability models, the universal generating operator (UGO) method, and a stochastic battery reserve time analysis, offering increased accuracy while remaining tractable and easy to understand.
This paper presents a methodology for modeling the availability of low-voltage direct current (LVDC) systems with battery storage, addressing the challenges posed by component failure through wear-out, the presence of many components, and the addition of battery storage to the system. While previous studies have explored various aspects of availability analysis for such systems, this methodology is unique in its comprehensive approach, combining component reliability models, semi-Markov availability models, the universal generating operator (UGO) method, and a stochastic battery reserve time analysis into a cohesive whole. This approach not only offers increased accuracy but also remains tractable and easy to understand. This methodology is validated by benchmarking against a Markov model implementation, demonstrating superior performance in terms of accuracy, where availability under-and over-estimations are avoided. This work has significant implications for maintenance planning and availability cost considerations of LVDC systems, while remaining computationally feasible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据