4.6 Article

Visualization of Metabolic Interaction Networks in Microbial Communities Using VisANT 5.0

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004875

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM103502-05, 1RC2GM092602-01, R01GM089978, 5R01DE024468]
  2. Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0004962]
  3. Joslin Diabetes Center [P30 DK036836]
  4. Army Research Office under MURI [W911NF-12-1-0390]
  5. NSF [1457695]
  6. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Biological Technologies Office (BTO), Program: Biological Robustness In Complex Settings (BRICS) [HR0011515303]
  7. DARPA/CMO [HR0011-15-C-0091]
  8. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complexity of metabolic networks in microbial communities poses an unresolved visualization and interpretation challenge. We address this challenge in the newly expanded version of a software tool for the analysis of biological networks, VisANT 5.0. We focus in particular on facilitating the visual exploration of metabolic interaction between microbes in a community, e.g. as predicted by COMETS (Computation of Microbial Ecosystems in Time and Space), a dynamic stoichiometric modeling framework. Using VisANT's unique meta-graph implementation, we show how one can use VisANT 5.0 to explore different time-dependent ecosystem-level metabolic networks. In particular, we analyze the metabolic interaction network between two bacteria previously shown to display an obligate cross-feeding interdependency. In addition, we illustrate how a putative minimal gut microbiome community could be represented in our framework, making it possible to highlight interactions across multiple coexisting species. We envisage that the symbiotic layout of VisANT can be employed as a general tool for the analysis of metabolism in complex microbial communities as well as heterogeneous human tissues. VisANT is freely available at: http://visant.bu.edu and COMETS at http://comets.bu.edu.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据