4.7 Article

Naphthalene acetic acid and scorbic acid significantly improve neutral lipid accumulation in Chlorella species under nutrient limitations

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2023.103311

关键词

Naphthalene acetic acid; Ascorbic acid; Neutral lipid accumulation; Nutrient limitation; Chlorella sp.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the combination of nutrient limitation with phytohormone or antioxidant supplementation to increase biomass and lipid production. The results show that this method is significantly effective for neutral lipid accumulation and the effects vary depending on the species.
Nutrient starvation condition has already been exploited as a suitable strategy to induce more lipid production. In this study, nutrient limitation has been coupled with phytohormone or antioxidant supplementation to identify the potential of chemical stimulants to support growth and neutral lipid accumulation. Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), and Ascorbic acid (AA), at concentrations of 5, 10, and 15 ppm were supplemented to Nlimited level 1 (0.25 g NO3-N/L), N-limited level 2 (0.041 gNO3-N/L), and P-limited (0.01 gPO4-P/L) culture media of two Chlorella species to maximize biomass and lipid production. The results show that neutral lipid content increases 70 % when AA is added to the P-limited medium of Chlorella vulgaris IG-R-96 at 15 ppm. At Nlimitation level 1 coupled with NAA and AA supplementations at 15 ppm, neutral lipid contents increase 107 % and 128 % in C. vulgaris IG-R-96, and 42 % and 60 % in Chlorella sorokiniana IG-W-96, respectively. When simultaneous N- and P-limitation is applied, neutral lipid content becomes almost double in C. vulgaris IG-R-96 at 10 ppm of NAA supplement. The effects of phytohormone and antioxidant on growth and neutral lipid accumulation is species-dependent and could be more effective when it is combined with nutrient limitation conditions. Stimulant supplementation is significantly effective for neutral lipid accumulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据