4.4 Review

Estrogen-Receptor-Low-Positive Breast Cancer: Pathological and Clinical Perspectives

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 9734-9745

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110706

关键词

estrogen receptor; breast cancer; estrogen receptor-low-positive breast cancer; endocrine therapy; triple-negative breast cancer

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) in breast cancer is a strong prognostic and predictive biomarker. However, there is a lack of clinical data regarding ER-low-positive breast cancer, especially in the metastatic setting. Including patients with ER-low-positive breast cancer in clinical trials may improve the understanding of this subtype and allow for the development of novel therapeutic approaches.
The expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) in breast cancer (BC) represents a strong prognostic and predictive biomarker and directs therapeutic decisions in early and advanced stages. ER-low-positive BC, defined by the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of ERs from 1% to 9%, constitutes a distinct subset of total BC cases. Guidelines recommend that a low expression of ERs be reported in pathology reports since the benefit of endocrine therapy in patients with ER-low-positive BC is uncertain. Recently, several cohorts, mostly of a retrospective nature, have been published, reporting the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of ER-low-positive BC. However, the majority of the data focus on early-stage BC and the use of (neo)adjuvant therapy, and there is a significant lack of data regarding metastatic ER-low-positive BC. Further factors, including tumor heterogeneity as well as the potential loss of ER expression due to endocrine resistance, should be considered. Including patients with ER-low-positive BC in clinical trials for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) might improve the understanding of this entity and allow novel therapeutic approaches. The design and conduction of randomized clinical trials regarding this subgroup of patients are greatly anticipated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据