4.3 Article

Logistical fixes and China's spatial division of logistics integration - in search of economic rebalancing?

期刊

EURASIAN GEOGRAPHY AND ECONOMICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2023.2292222

关键词

Spatial planning; logistical fixes; regional development; coastal-inland relations; spatial division of logistics integration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article emphasizes the significance of logistics, infrastructure, and capitalist circulation in the changing developmental paradigm of Chinese capitalism. It argues that two layered logistical fixes have shaped Chinese capitalism and led to unequal regional development between coastal and inland regions.
This article analytically foregrounds the role of logistics, infrastructure, and the transformation of capitalist circulation as an integral component of Chinese capitalism's changing developmental paradigm. Based on a historical-comparative study of two developmental paradigms, the Open Door Policy (1978-2013) and New Normal (2014-2021), we argue that two layered logistical fixes have shaped Chinese capitalism, while driving unequal regional development between the coastal and inland regions. During the Open Door Policy, the initial logistical fix was centered around the coastal region as an export platform and logistical hub. Consequently, networked spaces of capital accumulation were formed based on the transfer of raw materials and intermediary inputs from the inland to the coastal region, followed by their processing into marketable commodities valorized in global export markets. Following China's transition to the New Normal, the emergence of a new spatial division of labor between the coastal and inland regions necessitated a new logistical fix. This new logistical fix is notably centered around the inland region as a logistical hub, from which capital circulation and infrastructural linkages with neighboring Asian and coastal regions are being built.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据