4.6 Article

Suppression of Dopamine Neurons Mediates Reward

期刊

PLOS BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002586

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [TA 552/5-1]
  2. MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI [26840110, 26250001, 26120705, 26119503, 15K14307, 24770066, 25115008, 26840112]
  3. Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences Bioinformatics for Brain Sciences
  4. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan
  5. Naito Foundation
  6. Kurata Memorial Hitachi Science and Technology Foundation
  7. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  8. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01496, 24770066, 26840110, 15K14307, 26120705, 26119503, 26250001, 26840112, 25115008] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Massive activation of dopamine neurons is critical for natural reward and drug abuse. In contrast, the significance of their spontaneous activity remains elusive. In Drosophila melanogaster, depolarization of the protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) cluster dopamine neurons en masse signals reward to the mushroom body (MB) and drives appetitive memory. Focusing on the functional heterogeneity of PAM cluster neurons, we identified that a single class of PAM neurons, PAM-gamma 3, mediates sugar reward by suppressing their own activity. PAM-gamma 3 is selectively required for appetitive olfactory learning, while activation of these neurons in turn induces aversive memory. Ongoing activity of PAM-gamma 3 gets suppressed upon sugar ingestion. Strikingly, transient inactivation of basal PAM-gamma 3 activity can substitute for reward and induces appetitive memory. Furthermore, we identified the satiety-signaling neuropeptide Allatostatin A (AstA) as a key mediator that conveys inhibitory input onto PAM-gamma 3. Our results suggest the significance of basal dopamine release in reward signaling and reveal a circuit mechanism for negative regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据