Retained EU Law and Implications for Pregnant Workers: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspective

Using the lenses and language of therapeutic jurisprudence, this paper will argue that the rights of pregnant workers are vulnerable in a post-Brexit climate. Whilst the sunset clause from the Retained EU Law Bill, which would have caused all retained EU law to automatically expire at the end of 2023 unless expressly stated otherwise by Ministers, was lifted, the original drafts of the Bill made clear the government's lack of respect for and interest in protecting workers' rights (amongst others). Furthermore, despite the abandonment of the sunset, the now legislated Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023, aiming to deal with all laws that were once of European origin, still gives Ministers wide powers with limited input from Parliament to change EU derived legislation and replace with UK provision. Using an example from employment law, specifically, pregnant workers, this paper will show that the Act is a therapeutic jurisprudence unfriendly bottle as it has the potential to violate positive physical, social, and psychological outcomes. Recognising that these laws are currently vulnerable, we urge the government to keep intact (and potentially enhance) the laws protecting pregnant workers.

Automated summary

Using therapeutic jurisprudence, this paper argues that the rights of pregnant workers are vulnerable in a post-Brexit climate. Despite the lifting of the sunset clause, the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 still grants the government wide powers to change EU derived legislation. Through an example from employment law, the paper demonstrates the potential violation of positive outcomes for pregnant workers.