3.8 Article

Inquiry beyond knowledge

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Philosophy

Inquiring Minds Want to Improve

Arianna Falbo

Summary: This article discusses the epistemology of inquiry and argues against the narrow view that inquiry is only about gaining knowledge. The author proposes a broader approach that sees inquiry as aiming for epistemic improvement and provides various cases to support this perspective.

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2023)

Article Philosophy

THE AIM OF INQUIRY?

Jane Friedman

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2023)

Article Philosophy

Evidentialism and Epistemic Duties to Inquire

Emily C. McWilliams

Summary: This article discusses the issue of epistemic duties to inquire. The author argues that evidentialists are committed to the idea that we have a duty to inquire if we have a duty to believe well. This is because inquiry is sometimes necessary for forming doxastically justified beliefs, which are proportioned to and based on one's evidence. The author also suggests that evidentialists who oppose epistemic norms on inquiry should reconsider their position.

PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY (2023)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Inquiry, knowledge and understanding

Christoph Kelp

Summary: This paper bridges two important debates in epistemology, namely on the goal of inquiry and on the nature of understanding, offering a unified knowledge-based account of both.

SYNTHESE (2021)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Hedging and the ignorance norm on inquiry

Peter van Elswyk et al.

Summary: This paper argues that skeptical attitudes are compatible with inquiry, and offers two arguments based on considerations about the role of hedging in inquiry and the goal-directed nature of inquiry.

SYNTHESE (2021)

Article Philosophy

COMMENTS AND CRITICISM FALLIBILISM AND CONSEQUENCE

Adam Marushak

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2021)

Article Philosophy

Inquiry and the epistemic

David Thorstad

Summary: The zetetic turn in epistemology raises questions about the relationship, tension, and reaction between epistemic and zetetic norms. The focal point view suggests that traditional epistemic norms and zetetic norms answer different types of normative questions, with an inherent evaluative tension but does not necessitate revision of traditional epistemic norms. The study concludes by highlighting the importance of zetetic epistemology in the study of theoretical rationality.

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES (2021)

Article Philosophy

Knowledge of Objective 'Oughts': Monotonicity and the New Miners Puzzle

Daniel Munoz et al.

Summary: In the classic Miners case, an agent should do what they know is objectively wrong. This challenges the idea that objective 'oughts' are more authoritative, and the intuition must be given up in light of a monotonicity principle.

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2021)

Article Philosophy

The Epistemic and the Zetetic

Jane Friedman

PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW (2020)

Article Philosophy

CERTAINTY IN ACTION

Bob Beddor

PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY (2020)

Article Philosophy

The Game of Belief

Barry Maguire et al.

PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW (2020)

Article Philosophy

Modal Virtue Epistemology

Bob Beddor et al.

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2020)

Article Philosophy

The Toxin and the Dogmatist

Bob Beddor

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2019)

Article Philosophy

Abominable KK Failures

Kevin Dorst

Article Philosophy

Inquiry and Belief

Jane Friedman

Article Philosophy

Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy

Kevin Dorst

Article Philosophy

An Accuracy Based Approach to Higher Order Evidence

Miriam Schoenfield

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2018)

Article Philosophy

ONE KIND OF ASKING

Dennis Whitcomb

PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY (2017)

Article Philosophy

Why Suspend Judging?

Jane Friedman

Article Philosophy

Robust Virtue Epistemology As Anti-Luck Epistemology: A New Solution

J. Adam Carter

PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY (2016)

Article Philosophy

BRIDGING RATIONALITY AND ACCURACY

Miriam Schoenfield

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2015)

Article Philosophy

POSSIBLY FALSE KNOWLEDGE

Alex Worsnip

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2015)

Article Philosophy

Iteration Principles in Epistemology I: Arguments For

Daniel Greco

PHILOSOPHY COMPASS (2015)

Article Philosophy

COULD KK BE OK?

Daniel Greco

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2014)

Article Philosophy

THE DOGMATISM PUZZLE

Maria Lasonen-Aarnio

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2014)

Article Philosophy

Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment

Jacob Ross et al.

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2014)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Expected Accuracy Supports Conditionalization-and Conglomerability and Reflection

Kenny Easwaran

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2013)

Article Philosophy

Dubious objections from iterated conjunctions

Matthew A. Benton

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES (2013)

Article Philosophy

QUESTION-DIRECTED ATTITUDES

Jane Friedman

PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES (2013)

Article Philosophy

FALLIBILISM, EPISTEMIC POSSIBILITY, AND EPISTEMIC AGENCY

Baron Reed

PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES (2013)

Article Philosophy

Knowledge: The Safe-Apt View

Christoph Kelp

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2013)

Article Philosophy

ANTI-LUCK VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY

Duncan Pritchard

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2012)

Article Philosophy

WHAT'S THE POINT OF KNOWLEDGE ANYWAY?

Christoph Kelp

EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY (2011)

Article Philosophy

Scoring Rules and Epistemic Compromise

Sarah Moss

Article Philosophy

IFS AND OUGHTS

Niko Kolodny et al.

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2010)

Article Philosophy

KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION

John Hawthorne et al.

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2008)

Article Philosophy

Safety, content, apriority, self-knowledge

David Manley

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2007)

Article Philosophy

Evidence, pragmatics, and justification

J Fantl et al.

PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW (2002)