3.8 Article

Supporting Positive Post-School Outcomes for Students With Disabilities in Rural Locations

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/87568705231214809

关键词

disability; employment; postsecondary education; rural special education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals with disabilities in rural areas may face additional barriers to employment and postsecondary education, such as transportation issues, limited opportunities, and varied perceptions on the value of higher education. Special educators in rural schools may also have limited training opportunities and diverse responsibilities. Strategies to address these discrepancies include augmenting teacher training, partnering with vocational rehabilitation, improving public policy, and leveraging the strengths of rural communities.
Individuals with disabilities are less likely than their peers without disabilities to be employed or enrolled in postsecondary education. Even with federal legislation efforts designed to provide targeted supports to this population, the discrepancy persists. Students with disabilities who attend schools in rural settings may experience additional barriers to employment and postsecondary enrollment not faced by those in urban and suburban locales. This article reviews post-school outcomes and barriers that youth with disabilities in rural areas may encounter. These may include concerns related to transportation, limited opportunities, and varied perceptions on the value of higher education. In addition, special educators in rural schools may have limited training opportunities and a wide range of position responsibilities that require expertise in many areas. Then, to help address these discrepancies, strategies to support students and improve services are presented in four broad areas, including (a) augmenting teacher training and practice, (b) partnering with vocational rehabilitation, (c) improving public policy, and (d) leveraging the strengths of rural communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据