4.5 Article

PMoO12@NH2-MIL-53(Fe)-derived iron molybdate/iron oxide with nitrogen-doped carbon nanocomposites as anodes for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

IONICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-023-05337-9

关键词

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs); Transition metal oxides (TMOs); FeMoO4; Anodes; Lithium-ion batteries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transition metal oxides (TMOs) have high theoretical specific capacity and are considered as promising alternatives to carbon-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. However, they suffer from rapid capacity fading during cycling. This study successfully synthesized FeMoO4/Fe2O3-NC nanocomposites, which exhibit exceptional cycling stability and rate capability.
Transition metal oxides (TMOs) possess the distinct advantage of high theoretical specific capacity and are considered as one of the promising alternatives to carbon-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. However, the significant volume expansion experienced by TMOs during lithiation and delithiation processes leads to rapid capacity fading, thereby limiting their widespread applications. In this study, we synthesized PMoO12@NH2-MIL-53(Fe) precursors through a solvothermal method followed by high-temperature treatment to obtain FeMoO4/Fe2O3-NC nanocomposites. The inclusion of FeMoO4 as a crucial component not only provides a large capacity but also enhances the performance due to the synergistic effects with Fe2O3. The resulting multicomponent FeMoO4/Fe2O3-NC nanoparticles exhibit exceptional cycling stability and rate capability. Under optimized conditions, the specific capacity of FeMoO4/Fe2O3-NC can be maintained at approximately 1021 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles at a current density of 100 mA g(-1), while achieving an average specific capacity of up to 862 mAh g(-1) even under high current densities such as 500 mA g(-1). In conclusion, the research potential of FeMoO4/Fe2O3-NC anodes for lithium-ion batteries is worth more attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据