4.3 Article

Impaired serotonin synthesis in hippocampus of murine lupus represents an early neuropsychiatric event

期刊

LUPUS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09612033231221651

关键词

Systemic lupus erythematosus; neuropsychiatric lupus; serotonin; hippocampus; microglia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that impaired hippocampal serotonin synthesis is an early neuropsychiatric event in systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE). These findings may have important implications for the use of symptomatic therapy in diffuse NPSLE.
Background: Despite significant progress in understanding the mechanisms underlying hippocampal involvement in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE), our understanding of how neuroinflammation affects the brain neurotransmitter systems is limited. To date, few studies have investigated the role of neurotransmitters in pathogenesis of NPSLE with contradictory results. Methods: Hippocampal tissue from NZB/W-F1 lupus-prone mice and age-matched control strains were dissected in both pre-nephritic (3-month-old) and nephritic (6-month-old) stages. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was used to evaluate the level of serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and their metabolites 5-HIAA and DOPAC, respectively, in mouse hippocampi. Results: Lupus mice exhibit decreased levels of serotonin at the early stages of the disease, along with intact levels of its metabolite 5-HIAA. The 5-HT turnover ratio (5-HIAA/5-HT ratio) was increased in the hippocampus of lupus mice at pre-nephritic stage suggesting that low hippocampal serotonin levels in lupus are attributed to decreased serotonin synthesis. Both DA and DOPAC levels remained unaffected in lupus hippocampus at both early and late stages. Conclusion: Impaired hippocampal serotonin synthesis in the hippocampus of lupus-prone mice represents an early neuropsychiatric event. These findings may have important implications for the use of symptomatic therapy in diffuse NPSLE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据