4.7 Article

Profile Characterization of Biogenic Amines in Glioblastoma Patients Undergoing Standard-of-Care Treatment

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11082261

关键词

biogenic amines; metabolomic profiling; glioblastoma; concurrent chemoradiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the plasma levels of biogenic amines in glioblastoma patients undergoing treatment and develops a predictive tool based on these levels. Surgery and chemoradiation have effects on the levels of biogenic amines, and treatment phases can be accurately classified using machine learning models.
Introduction: Biogenic amines play important roles throughout cellular metabolism. This study explores a role of biogenic amines in glioblastoma pathogenesis. Here, we characterize the plasma levels of biogenic amines in glioblastoma patients undergoing standard-of-care treatment. Methods: We examined 138 plasma samples from 36 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma at multiple stages of treatment. Untargeted gas chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF MS) was used to measure metabolite levels. Machine learning approaches were then used to develop a predictive tool based on these datasets. Results: Surgery was associated with increased levels of 12 metabolites and decreased levels of 11 metabolites. Chemoradiation was associated with increased levels of three metabolites and decreased levels of three other metabolites. Ensemble learning models, specifically random forest (RF) and AdaBoost (AB), accurately classified treatment phases with high accuracy (RF: 0.81 +/- 0.04, AB: 0.78 +/- 0.05). The metabolites sorbitol and N-methylisoleucine were identified as important predictive features and confirmed via SHAP. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe plasma biogenic amine signatures throughout the treatment of patients with glioblastoma. A larger study is needed to confirm these results with hopes of developing a diagnostic algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据