4.7 Article

Influence of kilned specialty malt odorant markers on the aroma composition and sensory profile of beer

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114195

关键词

Specialty malt; Beer; Aroma; Sensory; Transfer rates; Maillard

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specialty malt beers are brewed to provide unique flavor and color, which are influenced by the chemical compositions of special malts. Brewing trials showed that kilned specialty malts have an impact on the properties of wort and beer. The study found that the boiling process led to significant losses of KSM odorant markers, and that Maillard aldehydes derived from KSM played a major role in the sensory profile of the beers. The research also suggested that the brewing process has a high influence on the formation of KSM odorants and the aroma composition of the final beer.
Specialty malt beers are brewed with the intention of providing distinct flavour and colour. To this end, special malts have different chemical compositions. More specifically, the availability of enzymes, small peptides, organic acids, Maillard products, low-molecular weight sugars and amino acids depend on the malting procedure applied and thus vary between the malt styles. To investigate the influence of kilned specialty malts (KSM) on the properties of wort and beer, brewing trials were carried out adding 10 and 20% of pale ale, Vienna, Munich or melanoidin malt. Alongside sensory analysis, the aroma composition of each beer was investigated throughout their brewing processes, revealing significant losses of the KSM odorant markers after the boiling process. Statistical analysis indicated a major influence of KSM-derived Maillard aldehydes on the sensory profile of the beers. Finally, the transfer rates of the odorants were calculated from the malt to the beer, suggesting a high influence of the brewing process on the formation of KSM odorants and thus on the aroma composition of the final beer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据