4.7 Article

Random Bosonic States for Robust Quantum Metrology

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041044

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC AdG OSYRIS)
  2. Axa Chair in Quantum Information Science
  3. John Templeton Foundation
  4. Spanish National Plan FOQUS [FIS2013-46768]
  5. MINECO (Severo Ochoa Grant) [SEV-2015-0522]
  6. Fundacio Privada Cellex
  7. Foundation for Polish Science
  8. NCN Grant [DEC-2013/09/N/ST1/02772]
  9. European Union [705109, 655161, 700140]
  10. MPQ-ICFO
  11. ICFOnest+(FP7-PEOPLE-COFUND)
  12. European Research Council (ERC CoG QITBOX)
  13. Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR 874, 875]
  14. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [705109, 700140, 655161] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  15. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study how useful random states are for quantum metrology, i.e., whether they surpass the classical limits imposed on precision in the canonical phase sensing scenario. First, we prove that random pure states drawn from the Hilbert space of distinguishable particles typically do not lead to superclassical scaling of precision even when allowing for local unitary optimization. Conversely, we show that random pure states from the symmetric subspace typically achieve the optimal Heisenberg scaling without the need for local unitary optimization. Surprisingly, the Heisenberg scaling is observed for random isospectral states of arbitrarily low purity and preserved under loss of a fixed number of particles. Moreover, we prove that for pure states, a standard photon-counting interferometric measurement suffices to typically achieve resolution following the Heisenberg scaling for all values of the phase at the same time. Finally, we demonstrate that metrologically useful states can be prepared with short random optical circuits generated from three types of beam splitters and a single nonlinear (Kerr-like) transformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据