3.8 Article

'God's Story' as ideological determinant in faith-based cosmopolitanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RELIGION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2023.2284539

关键词

Faith-based organizations; humanitarianism; missionaries; cosmopolitanism

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In his 2017 book, David Hollinger argues that Protestant American missionaries, historically, had a 'boomerang' effect on their targeted populations by intending to change them through evangelism. However, they ended up having a greater impact on the population they departed from. This boomerang effect is attributed to the missionaries' altered values that made them more critical of racism, colonialism, and religious inflexibility, leading to the concept of 'missionary cosmopolitanism'. The study suggests that this process continues as Christian faith-based humanitarian and development workers are 'cosmopolitanized' through their fieldwork.
In his 2017 book, David Hollinger argues that, historically, Protestant American missionaries acted like 'boomerangs' with the intent of changing their targeted populations through evangelism. In actuality, their work had a greater effect on the population from which they departed. This boomerang effect is the consequence of an alteration of values arising from mission work abroad that made missionaries more critical of racism, colonialism, and religious inflexibility, resulting in 'missionary cosmopolitanism'. We argue that this process has not stopped. Many Christian faith-based humanitarian and development workers continue to be 'cosmopolitanized' through their fieldwork. Our data consist of interviews with over 60 self-identified Christian humanitarians, conducted in locations across Canada, the United States, South Sudan, and Kenya. Using these data and theories of cosmopolitanism, especially the work of German sociologist Ulrich Beck, we explore the central components and conceptualize the limits of contemporary faith-based cosmopolitanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据