4.8 Article

CellCharter reveals spatial cell niches associated with tissue remodeling and cell plasticity

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01588-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CellCharter is an algorithmic framework that identifies, characterizes, and compares cellular niches in spatially resolved datasets. It outperforms existing approaches and has been successfully applied to different technologies and datasets, uncovering important cellular niches associated with cancer progression and patient prognosis in lung cancer.
Tissues are organized in cellular niches, the composition and interactions of which can be investigated using spatial omics technologies. However, systematic analyses of tissue composition are challenged by the scale and diversity of the data. Here we present CellCharter, an algorithmic framework to identify, characterize, and compare cellular niches in spatially resolved datasets. CellCharter outperformed existing approaches and effectively identified cellular niches across datasets generated using different technologies, and comprising hundreds of samples and millions of cells. In multiple human lung cancer cohorts, CellCharter uncovered a cellular niche composed of tumor-associated neutrophil and cancer cells expressing markers of hypoxia and cell migration. This cancer cell state was spatially segregated from more proliferative tumor cell clusters and was associated with tumor-associated neutrophil infiltration and poor prognosis in independent patient cohorts. Overall, CellCharter enables systematic analyses across data types and technologies to decode the link between spatial tissue architectures and cell plasticity. CellCharter is a flexible, platform-agnostic method for identifying cell niches in spatially resolved data. Analysis of lung cancers demonstrates the importance of considering spatial information, exemplified by a neutrophil-associated niche that correlates with an aggressive cancer cell state and patient prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据