4.8 Review

Self-Compression of High Energy Ultrashort Laser Pulses

期刊

LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202300595

关键词

high power laser; pulse compression; ultrafast laser; ultrashort pulse generation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the latest advances in self-compression techniques without dispersion compensation optics for high-energy few-cycle pulse generation over the past two decades. Various experimental approaches and their potential applications in generating extremely intense optical fields for strong-field physics research are discussed.
Nonlinear pulse compression techniques have been applied widely in the pursuit of ultra-intense laser pulse with extremely high pulse energy (approximate to mJ) and extremely short pulse duration (approximate to sub-10 fs). Although postcompression techniques using dispersive gratings or chirped mirrors have achieved 1 TW few-cycle pulses, further increasing of the pulse intensity is limited by the damage threshold of dispersive optics, especially when self-focusing and ionization in the propagation medium are considered. To overcome such limitations, ultrashort pulses self-compression techniques without vulnerable dispersive optics have been explored in the past two decades. In this paper, the latest advances in these techniques will be reviewed with a discussion on the progress of various experimental approaches as well as their potential applications and roles in generating extremely intense optical fields for strong-field physics research. Self-compression techniques without dispersion compensation optics have been explored for high-energy few-cycle pulse generation in the past two decades. In this paper, the latest advances in these techniques will be reviewed with a discussion on the progress of various experimental approaches as well as their potential applications in generating extremely intense optical fields for strong-field physics research.image

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据