4.7 Article

Improved coverage path planning for indoor robots based on BIM and robotic configurations

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105160

关键词

Coverage path planning; Indoor robots; Building information modeling; Coverage bonus; Cluster generalized traveling salesman problem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an improved coverage path planning system that leverages building information modeling and robotic configurations to optimize coverage performance in indoor environments. Experimental validation shows the effectiveness and applicability of the system. Future research will focus on further enhancing coverage ratio and optimizing computation time.
Robotics holds great potential to improve productivity in construction, and coverage path planning (CPP) is an essential capability crucial to various applications, including floor cleaning and environmental monitoring. However, there is still a lack of a comprehensive CPP system that can handle complex indoor conditions and various robotic properties. An improved CPP (ICCP) system that leverages building information modeling (BIM) and robotic configurations for indoor robots is proposed in this study. Firstly, BIM is semantically enriched to generate semantic trapezoidal grid maps (TGMs); Next, a novel concept called coverage bonus is incorporated into coverage pattern analysis to enable farsighted decision making; Finally, the coverage sequence is optimized by solving the cluster generalized traveling salesman problem, resulting in routes that minimize both coverage distances and disruptions in indoor activities. Experimental validation shows that the ICPP system can not only attain optimal coverage performance with the highest coverage ratio (97.6%) but also ensure the adherence to indoor coverage rules. Future research will focus on enhancing coverage ratio through tunable hyperparameters, optimizing computation time in ICCP, and expanding the study to multi-robot scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据