4.4 Article

Quantitative Analysis of Mixtures Based on Portable Spatial Heterodyne Raman Spectrometer

期刊

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2023.2284219

关键词

Interference data; Raman spectroscopy; regression modeling; spatial heterodyne Raman spectrometer; support vector regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial heterodyne Raman spectroscopy combined with chemometric methodologies was used to quantitatively analyze mixtures. Variational mode decomposition and chemometric methods improved the prediction accuracy, and support vector regression showed the best predictive performance among the tested models.
Spatial heterodyne Raman spectroscopy has been widely applied in various fields due to its non-contact, nondestructive, fast, high stability, and high spectral resolution characteristics. This article integrated spatial heterodyne Raman spectroscopy with chemometric methodologies to assess the feasibility of peak-to-peak ratio regression, partial least squares regression, support vector machine regression, and non-negative matrix factorization for the quantitative analysis of mixtures. Chemometrics methods were used to model and analyze the interference data in the interferogram domain, and variational mode decomposition was used to extract features from the interference data, further improving the interference data's modeling and prediction accuracy. The results demonstrate that modal intensities obtained through variational mode decomposition of interference data improve the prediction accuracy of regression analysis. Support vector regression exhibited the most favorable predictive performance among the tested models. The root mean square error of cross-validation was reduced from 5.55% to 2.64%, and the prediction root mean square error was reduced from 5.08% to 1.5%. The improved model utilizing interference data showed higher fitting accuracy and more precise sample predictions compared to spectral data modeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据