4.7 Article

Discriminating the existence regions and dynamics between quartic self-similar pulse and dissipative pure quartic soliton in ultrashort fiber laser

期刊

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110353

关键词

Quartic self-similar pulse; Dissipative pure quartic soliton; Cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation; Soliton dynamics; Fiber laser

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the existence regions and dynamics of quartic self-similar pulses (QSSPs) and dissipative pure-quartic-solitons (DPQSs) in a mode-locked fiber laser with pure positive fourth-order dispersion (FOD). It is found that the laser tends to emit QSSPs with high nonlinear gain and generate DPQS pulses with low nonlinear gain. The energy carried by QSSP is higher than that of DPQS pulse due to the instability caused by excessive pulse pedestal.
Recently, both quartic self-similar pulses (QSSPs) and dissipative pure-quartic-solitons (DPQSs) pulses have been theoretically demonstrated in mode-locked fiber laser with pure positive fourth-order dispersion (FOD). Here, we investigate the existence regions and dynamics of those two soliton pulses by numerically solving the cubicquintic Ginzburg-Landau equation. We find the positive FOD fiber laser tends to emit QSSPs in the presence of high nonlinear gain, while it is apt to generate DPQS pulses in the case of low nonlinear gain. An unstable pulse region separates the QSSP region from the DPQS region. The characteristics of QSSP and DPQS pulses are dependent on the nonlinear gain and FOD. The QSSP can carry more energy than that of DPQS pulse, because the DPQS pulse with large energy could be unstable due to the excessive pulse pedestal. Our results are not only useful for understanding the dynamics of the DPQS pulse and QSSP in the cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation with pure FOD, but also provide a guideline for generating high-energy pulses from the positive FOD fiber laser.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据