4.7 Article

Primal dual algorithm for solving the nonsmooth Twin SVM

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107567

关键词

Twin SVM; Primal dual algorithm; Hinge loss

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an improved version of Twin SVM using a non-smooth optimization method is proposed. The proposed approach solves the problem of limited handle Gaussian noise, exaggerated influence of outliers and inability to handle unbalanced data in Twin SVM. By transforming the two-constraint optimization models into an unconstrained non-smooth optimization problem and using the primal dual method to solve it, the proposed approach demonstrates its effectiveness and applicability through experiments on different datasets.
In this paper, we propose an improved version of Twin SVM using a non-smooth optimization method. Twin SVM generally consists in determining two non-parallel planes by alternately solving two constrained optimization models. Solving this problem using the classical Lagrangian method has many limitations, notably: its only limited to handle Gaussian noise, generally exaggerates the influence of outliers and cannot handle unbalanced data, this due to the differentiability of the model. To circumvent these issues, we transform two-constraint optimization models using the penalty method into an unconstrained non-smooth optimization one. The non-smoothness nature of the problem has many advantages, but it requires special treatment, which is why we use the primal dual method to solve it, since it is the most appropriate and it is robust in terms of stability, convergence and speed (Lyaqini, Nachaoui and Hadri, 2022). To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, several experiments were carried out on numerous UCI benchmarks, medical image and HandPD datasets. These experiments demonstrated the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach, with satisfactory results compared to the state of the art.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据