4.6 Article

Integrated Assessment and Restoration Pathways for Holistic Ecosystem Health in Anxi County, China

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su152215932

关键词

ecosystem health; ecosystem community; ecological conservation and restoration; ecosystem services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecosystem protection and restoration should consider interrelated ecosystems. A study in Anxi County, China, constructed an integrated assessment system and identified ecosystem health levels, leading to tailored ecosystem restoration pathways.
Different types of ecosystems form a complex community of life. Hence, ecosystem protection and restoration should not focus solely on a single ecosystem. Ecosystem health assessments should consider the integrity and systematicity of interrelated ecosystems to inform rational environmental planning and management. In this study, the key characteristic indicators of major ecosystems (mountain, water, forest, and cropland) and ecosystem service capacity indicators in Anxi County, China, were selected to construct an integrated assessment system of ecosystem health that led to integrated ecosystem restoration pathways that addressed the county's ecological problems. The results revealed that ecosystem health was higher in the western and lower in the eastern parts of the county. Throughout the county, medium and poor ecosystem health levels predominated, revealing that overall ecosystem sustainability was weak. Ecosystem restoration programmes should be tailored to each health level. Where there was excellent and good ecosystem health ratings, those healthy ecosystem functions should be strengthened and maintained. In the medium health areas, the control and prevention of ecological problems should be strengthened. Poor health areas require immediate integrated ecological restoration projects that ensure the connectivity and coordination of restoration tasks in fragile ecosystems. This then will enhance holistic ecosystem stability and sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据