4.2 Article

Ornithomya biloba, Pseudolynchia garzettae and Pseudolynchia canariensis (Diptera: Hippoboscidae): three new United Kingdom colonists and potential disease vectors

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mve.12703

关键词

avian parasites; citizen science; colonisation; ectoparasites; flat fly; key; louse fly; parasites; range change; range expansion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the first large-scale citizen science study of the Hippoboscidae in the United Kingdom, revealing the colonization of the country by three species of Diptera in the family Hippoboscidae. Previously considered vagrants, the presence of these species' pairs in the act of copulation, gravid females, and an increase in population numbers indicate local breeding activity. The study also discusses the potential further northwards range shift of these species and its implications on avian disease spread in the region.
In the northern hemisphere, many species' ranges are shifting northwards with climate change. Here I present evidence, from the first large-scale citizen science study of the Hippoboscidae in the United Kingdom, for the colonisation of the United Kingdom by three species of Diptera in the family Hippoboscidae, which are obligate ectoparasites of birds. The Swallow Louse Fly, Ornithomya biloba; the Nightjar Louse Fly, Pseudolynchia garzettae and the Pigeon Louse Fly, Pseudolynchia canariensis were previously considered to be vagrants from more southerly latitudes but the presence of a pair taken possibly in the act of copulation, gravid females and the increase in numbers of the various species provides good evidence of local breeding activity. I discuss the potential for further northwards range shift and whether the presence of three new species of parasite may have implications for the spread of avian disease within the region. I also include a concise key to the genus Pseudolynchia and images of P. canariensis, P. garzettae and O. biloba to aid further identification of these species in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据