☆ 4.3 Article

Scientific misconduct: A cross-sectional study of the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Spanish researchers

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

相关参考文献

注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。

Article Medical Ethics

Evolution and characterization of health sciences paper retractions in Brazil and Portugal

Cristina Candal-Pedreira et al.

Summary: This article assessed the development of health science retractions in Brazil and Portugal and described their characteristics. The findings showed an increase in the number of retractions over time, with plagiarism being the most frequent cause of misconduct. The time from publication to retraction decreased as the journal's quartile increased.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

NSF Fellows' perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia

Siddhartha Roy et al.

Summary: This study anonymously surveyed 244 recipients of the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships in the US and found increased concern about perverse incentives, performance metrics, and hyper-competition in academia. The fellows ranked scientific advancement as the top metric for evaluating academics and expressed a high rate of academic cheating and research misconduct. Many felt unprepared for dealing with ethical issues and viewed pressures for funding and publication as negative aspects of academia.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2023)

添加到收藏夹

Article

Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers

Nick Allum et al.

F1000Research (2023)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers

Matthias Kaiser et al.

Summary: The study found a low percentage of self-reported fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (FFP) among researchers, but a troublingly high percentage of researchers reporting engaging in more questionable research practices (QRPs). Overall, researchers generally consider FFP to be more serious than QRPs.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The Research Integrity Office in Spain. A pending issue

Cristina Candal-Pedreira et al.

Summary: In recent years, scientific misconduct cases have been exposed, highlighting global breaches in scientific integrity. Spain has also witnessed high-profile cases of scientific misconduct. However, there is currently no organization or agency in place to monitor the ethical aspects of biomedical research. It is therefore necessary to establish an independent office to investigate and impose sanctions on cases of suspected scientific misconduct, particularly in publicly funded research to prevent misappropriation of public funds.

GACETA SANITARIA (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study

Cristina Candal-Pedreira et al.

Summary: This study describes the characteristics, visibility, and impact of retracted papers originating from paper mills, as well as the journals in which they were published. The findings indicate that these retracted papers are predominantly from China and are published in a small number of journals. The frequency of retracted papers from paper mills is increasing, posing a problem for the research community.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers' Perceptions in Spain

Ramon A. Feenstra et al.

Summary: Empirical studies have shown a prevalence of research misconduct in ethics and philosophy in Spain, with researchers perceiving an increase in such behavior. Common fraudulent practices include duplicate publication, self-plagiarism, use of personal influence, and citation manipulation. Researchers associate the spread of these misconducts with the research evaluation model applied in Spain.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions.

Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca et al.

Summary: The study reveals a significant incidence of scientific fraud in the European Union, particularly in the fields of Life Science and Biomedicine. Germany leads the ranking for FFP, while Italy ranks first in Plagiarism. The majority of retracted articles were published in journals with impact factors, causing substantial losses for authors, publishers, and institutions.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Ethics

Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yu Xie et al.

Summary: This meta-analysis provides updated estimates of the prevalence of research misconduct (RM) and questionable research practices (QRPs), highlighting factors that influence the prevalence of these issues. Results show that researchers often witness others committing RM and using QRPs, with response proportion, limited recall period, career level, disciplinary background, and locations significantly affecting the prevalence of irresponsible research behaviors.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

Tamarinde Haven et al.

Summary: The study found that individual, climate, and publication factors combined explained 34% of the variance in perceived frequency of research misbehavior, with climate factors playing the most significant role. The results suggest that improving departmental norms can have a positive impact on behavior.

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Education & Educational Research

The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences

Kristy Holtfreter et al.

STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy

Alex Mabou Tagne et al.

JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors

Isabel Campos-Varela et al.

GACETA SANITARIA (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Ethics

Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China

Nannan Yi et al.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema

David Shaw

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions

Rafaelly Stavale et al.

PLOS ONE (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medical Ethics

Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe

Nannan Yi et al.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Education, Scientific Disciplines

Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education

Lauren Maggio et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models

Tamarinde L. Haven et al.

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities

Simon Godecharle et al.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010

Qing-Jiao Liao et al.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

Association of Compensation From the Surgical and Medical Device Industry to Physicians and Self-declared Conflict of Interest

Kasra Ziai et al.

JAMA SURGERY (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Clinical Neurology

Perception of ethical misconduct by neuropsychology professionals in Spain

Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa et al.

NEUROREHABILITATION (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity

Daniele Fanelli et al.

PLOS ONE (2015)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Scientific misconducts in the darkening gray zone

Mu-ming Poo

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2015)

添加到收藏夹

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

The integrity of science - Lost in translation?

Matthias Kaiser

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY (2014)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country

Patrick I. Okonta et al.

BMC MEDICAL ETHICS (2014)

添加到收藏夹

Article Information Science & Library Science

Ethics and Spanish journals of communication, education, and psychology: the publishers' perception

Ma Carmen Fonseca-Mora et al.

REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA (2014)

添加到收藏夹

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey

Hendrik P. van Dalen et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2012)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

Ferric C. Fang et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2012)

添加到收藏夹

News Item Medicine, General & Internal

Survey of Dutch doctors finds evidence of widespread research misconduct

Tony Sheldon

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2012)

添加到收藏夹

Article Nursing

Research Coordinators' Experiences With Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity

Barbara Habermann et al.

NURSING RESEARCH (2010)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

Daniele Fanelli

PLOS ONE (2009)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research

Raymond De Vries et al.

JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS (2006)

添加到收藏夹

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.