4.3 Article

Scientific misconduct: A cross-sectional study of the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Spanish researchers

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2284965

关键词

Scientific integrity; scientific misconduct; Spain; survey; perception

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of Spanish researchers regarding scientific misconduct in the field of biomedicine. The results show a high frequency of scientific misconduct among Spanish biomedical researchers, with 43.3% admitting to engaging in some form of misconduct. False authorship is the most common type of misconduct. There are variations in the types of misconduct based on gender and the type of research institution.
This study sought to identify the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Spanish researchers regarding different aspects relating to scientific misconduct, both overall and by gender, years of research experience, and type of research institution. This is a cross-sectional study based on an anonymous online survey, targeting researchers in the field of biomedicine. The survey comprised a first block (13 questions) covering sociodemographic data, and a second block (14 questions) covering researchers' perceptions, attitudes and experiences. A descriptive analysis was performed. 403 researchers answered the survey: 51.1% (n = 205) women, median age 45 years. The observed frequency of scientific misconduct was 78.8%. Additionally, 43.3% of researchers acknowledged having intentionally engaged in some type of scientific misconduct (self-reported frequency). The most frequent type of scientific misconduct was false authorship. The most frequent types of both observed and self-reported scientific misconduct did not appear to differ by years of experience but did differ by gender and type of research institution. In conclusion, there is a high frequency of scientific misconduct among Spanish biomedical science researchers as 4 of 10 researchers recognized that took part in any type of scientific misconduct. There are differences between the most frequent types of misconduct according to different characteristics, mainly type of institution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据