4.5 Article

Interactive effects of information and trust on consumer choices of organic food: Evidence from China

期刊

APPETITE
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107115

关键词

Information; Trust; Organic rice; Willingness-to-pay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the interactive effects of information and consumer trust on consumer preferences for organic food. The results show that consumers are willing to pay a higher price for organic food, especially those with higher levels of trust. The introduction of information significantly increases consumers' willingness to pay, with a greater increase observed among high-trust consumers.
A large number of studies have explored the separate roles of information and trust in consumer choices of organic food, but little attention has been paid to exploring the interactive effects of information and trust. Here, for the first time to our knowledge, we explored the joint effects of information and consumers' trust in shaping consumer preferences for organic food. A hypothetical choice experiment was employed to elicit consumer preferences for organic food, and a between-subject design approach was used to explore the effects of information. Our results from a sample of 2382 Chinese consumers indicated that consumers are willing to pay extra price for organic rice compared to the conventional rice. Notably, individuals with a high level of trust exhibited a significantly higher willingness to pay for organic rice than those with lower trust levels. Furthermore, the introduction of information leads to a substantial 40% increase in consumers' willingness to pay for organic rice, with an even more significant 50% increase observed among high-trust consumers. These results highlight the augmenting role of trust in amplifying the effects of information. Consequently, effective strategies should encompass both the provision of information and the cultivation of trust concurrently to promote consumer choices of organic food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据