4.7 Article

Occurrence, seasonal variation and gas/particle partitioning of current used pesticides (CUPs) across 60 °C temperature and 30° latitudes in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 464, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132983

关键词

Current used pesticides; Atmosphere; Pollution characteristic; Seasonal variation; Gas/particle partitioning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas and particle phase samples were collected at three sites in China, revealing variations in concentrations of different types of pesticides across regions and seasons, potentially influenced by local climates and crop cultivation patterns. The partitioning of pesticides between gas and particle phases was primarily determined by their physicochemical properties and ambient temperature.
Gas and particle phases samples were collected at three sites in China in 2019-2020, with 60 degrees C temperature span and 30 degrees latitude range. Totally, among 76 target current used pesticides (CUPs) with four types, 51 were quantified in at least one sample. The concentrations of individual CUPs ranged from 8 orders of magnitude, indicating different pollution levels. Herbicides were the dominated CUPs in Northeast China, while higher concentrations of fungicides were found in Southeast China. The highest concentrations of CUPs were observed in Southeast China in spring and winter, while in summer and autumn in Northeast China, caused by local climates and crop cultivation patterns. The gas/particle (G/P) partitioning of CUPs was mainly influenced by their physicochemical properties and ambient temperature. The G/P partitioning study indicated that the L-M-Y model was the optimum prediction model for herbicides, fungicides and pyrethroids. The L-M-Y model and the H-B model presented equal performance for organophosphate insecticides. To our knowledge, the L-M-Y model was firstly applied for the study of the G/P partitioning of CUPs, which provided new insights into the related fields of new emergency contaminates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据