4.6 Article

Mitigating the impacts of geomagnetic disturbances on the small signal stability

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109640

关键词

Blocking devices (BDs); Geomagnetic storms; Joint sensitivity scenarios; Fuzzy simulation; Induced geoelectric fields (IGFs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of geomagnetic disturbances on small signal stability in power systems and proposes the installation of blocking devices to mitigate the negative effects. Quantitative evaluation reveals that intense geomagnetic disturbances significantly increase the risk of small signal instability. Optimal placement of blocking devices based on sensitivity scenarios results in a significant reduction in the risk index compared to constant and varying induced geoelectric fields scenarios.
Geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) caused by geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) flow through the transformers, which lead to the increase of reactive power loss (QGIC). As reactive loads added to the system, QGIC causes the change of power flow distribution, which connects GMDs with small signal stability. Installing blocking devices (BDs) in the neutral points can reduce the negative effects on the grids. Obtaining the best effect is challenging, because the amplitude and direction of induced geoelectric fields (IGFs) are uncertain and non -stationary. Taking the credibility of damping ratio less than 0.05 as an index, the impact of GMDs on small signal stability is quantitatively evaluated. It is found that when intense GMDs occur, the risk of small signal instability increases significantly. Based on the voltage/damping ratio sensitivity joint feature space, the sensitivity scenario is obtained through scenario clustering. Moreover, upon optimal placement of BDs based on joint sensitivity (JS) scenarios, it is observed that the risk index can be significantly reduced compared to that in constant induced geoelectric fields (CIGF) and varying induced geoelectric fields (VIGF) scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据