4.8 Article

How the PEG terminals affect the electrochemical properties of polymer electrolytes in lithium metal batteries

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.103066

关键词

PEO terminals; Fluorinated polymer electrolytes; Ion conductivity; Electrochemical stability window; Lithium ion transference number

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study investigated the influence of four different methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (MPEG) based electrolytes with different terminals on the physical and electrochemical properties. It was found that the MPEG-3F with a trifluoroethoxy terminal exhibited higher ion conductivity, lithium ion transference number, and electrochemical stability.
Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) or poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) based electrolytes for lithium batteries have arouse great interest, however their application is still hindered by low ion conductivity (sigma) at room temperature, narrow electrochemical stability window (ESW) and low lithium ion transference number (LTN). Herein, we report the synthesis and comparative investigation of four kinds of methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (MPEG) based electrolytes with different terminals, including MPEG with a hydroxyl terminal (MPEG-OH), a propyl carbonate terminal (MPEG-PC), a methoxy terminal (MPEG-OCH3) and a trifluoroethoxy terminal (MPEG-3F). It is found that the terminals in MPEG electrolytes exert great influences on the physical and electrochemical properties, e. g., crystallization, viscosity, dissociation capacity of Li salts, chemical environment of fluorine, sigma, ESW, LTN and the cycling performance of lithium metal batteries. The-OH terminal is reactive with less stability, while-PC and -OCH3 result in moderate ionic transport. In comparison, MPEG-3F containing a trifluoroethoxy terminal affords high sigma because of the good dissociation of LiTFSI, high LTN because of encapsulating the TFSI anions, and wide ESW due to high-voltage-resistant fluorocarbon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据