4.7 Article

A novel parsimonious spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for sustainable urban transport solutions

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107447

关键词

Multi-criteria decision making; Analytic hierarchy process; Parsimonious analytic hierarchy process; Transport system; Mobility; Sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a sustainable and efficient solution for improving the public bus transport system in Dublin city. By attracting private car users, it aims to reduce CO2 emissions, minimize traffic congestions, and maximize commuter satisfaction. Using the parsimonious analytic hierarchy process model, the study evaluates uncertainty and decision maker scoring, providing consistent and reliable results.
Sustainable urban transport is the key factor for surviving the cities and developing the supply quality of the urban transport system has been esteemed in sustainable improvement for the cities. This work attempts to provide a sustainable and efficient solutions for ameliorating public bus transport system in Dublin city, Ireland. The developed system will attract private car users, which interns will achieve detract CO2 emissions, minimize traffic congestions and maximize commuter satisfaction. To evaluate this complex problem, the novel Parsimonious Analytic Hierarchy Process (P-AHP) is structured in a spherical fuzzy environment. The parsimonious spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (P- SF-AHP) model considers as an efficient solution not only for evaluating a large number of alternatives or criteria when using AHP, however, it esteems the hesitant scoring of the decision maker. The results are demonstrated and analyzed in detail and the step-by-step description of the procedure might foment other applications of the model. The unique process for evaluating the supply quality of urban transport system consumes less time and effort during estimating the survey, moreover, it provides more consistent and reliable outcomes through avoiding the uncertainty and ambiguity of decision makers during evaluation process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据