4.7 Article

A parallel finite element post-processing algorithm for the damped Stokes equations

期刊

COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 71-80

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2023.11.003

关键词

Partition of unity; Stokes equations; Damping; Parallel algorithm; Two-level method; Post-processing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents and analyzes a parallel finite element post-processing algorithm for the simulation of Stokes equations with a nonlinear damping term, which integrates the algorithmic advantages of the two-level approach, the partition of unity method, and the post-processing technique. The algorithm generates a global continuous approximate solution using the partition of unity method and improves the smoothness of the solution by adding an extra coarse grid correction step. It has good parallel performance and is validated through theoretical error estimates and numerical test examples.
This paper presents and analyzes a parallel finite element post-processing algorithm for the simulation of Stokes equations with a nonlinear damping term, which integrates the algorithmic advantages of the two level approach, the partition of unity method and post-processing technique. The most valuable highlights of the present algorithm are that (1) a global continuous approximate solution is generated via the partition of unity method; (2) by adding an extra coarse grid correction step, the smoothness of the approximate solution is improved; (3) it has a good parallel performance since there requires little communication in solving a series of residual problems in the subdomain of interest. We theoretically derive the L2-error estimates both for the approximate velocity and pressure and H1-error estimate for the velocity under some necessary conditions. Meanwhile, we numerically perform various test examples to validate the theoretically predicted convergence rate and illustrate the high efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据