4.6 Article

NMJ-morph reveals principal components of synaptic morphology influencing structure-function relationships at the neuromuscular junction

期刊

OPEN BIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.160240

关键词

synapse; neuromuscular junction; morphology; statistical modelling; NMJ-morph

资金

  1. Anatomy PhD Scholarship award from the University of Edinburgh
  2. Anatomy (University of Edinburgh)
  3. MNDA [838-791]
  4. MRC [MR/M024075/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to form synapses is one of the fundamental properties required by the mammalian nervous system to generate network connectivity. Structural and functional diversity among synaptic populations is a key hallmark of network diversity, and yet we know comparatively little about the morphological principles that govern variability in the size, shape and strength of synapses. Using the mouse neuromuscular junction (NMJ) as an experimentally accessible model synapse, we report on the development of a robust, standardized methodology to facilitate comparative morphometric analysis of synapses ('NMJ-morph'). We used NMJ-morph to generate baseline morphological reference data for 21 separate pre- and post-synaptic variables from 2160 individual NMJs belonging to nine anatomically distinct populations of synapses, revealing systematic differences in NMJ morphology between defined synaptic populations. Principal components analysis revealed that overall NMJ size and the degree of synaptic fragmentation, alongside pre-synaptic axon diameter, were the most critical parameters in defining synaptic morphology. 'Average' synaptic morphology was remarkably conserved between comparable synapses from the left and right sides of the body. Systematic differences in synaptic morphology predicted corresponding differences in synaptic function that were supported by physiological recordings, confirming the robust relationship between synaptic size and strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据