4.6 Article

Role of temperature fluctuations and shocks during refrigeration on pork and salmon quality

期刊

FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/fqsafe/fyad011

关键词

Pork; salmon; refrigeration; temperature fluctuations; temperature shocks; microbial growth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Refrigeration is crucial for preserving meat products, but temperature fluctuations and shocks during refrigeration can have significant impacts on product quality. This study found that temperature fluctuations and shocks accelerated the degradation of muscle proteins, increased meat spoilage, and reduced bacteria diversity. Therefore, it is important to control temperature fluctuations and shocks when storing meat products.
Refrigeration is considered a prime technology for preserving meat products. Temperature alterations are commonly ignored by industry during refrigeration, which have impacts on product quality. Thus, we conducted research on pork loin and salmon fillets that were preserved for 0, 5, 9, 12, and 15 d, where different temperature fluctuations and shocks were established on 4 degrees C. Data revealed that several meat parameters such as total volatile basic nitrogen, total viable count, and lipid oxidation were significantly changed in the +/- 2 degrees C fluctuations group compared with the constant temperature group. Additionally, both the temperature fluctuations and shocks groups had accelerated myofibril protein degradation, while desmin expression and species richness/diversity of bacteria were significantly reduced in the +/- 2 degrees C fluctuations group compared with the constant temperature group. Briefly, temperature fluctuations and shocks accelerated the destruction of muscle structural integrity. Furthermore, both conditions accelerated meat spoilage by progressively expanding the water-loss channels, which can reduce meat edibility. This study provides a new theoretical basis for the proper use of refrigerated temperatures for storing meat products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据