3.9 Article

Investigation of middle school and high school students' ecosystem knowledge through their drawings

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2023.2293753

关键词

Ecosystem knowledge; ecosystem drawing; energy flow; food pyramid; food web

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to examine middle and high school students' understanding of ecosystem knowledge, specifically in relation to the food web, food pyramid, and energy flow. The findings revealed that the majority of students struggled to accurately depict these concepts in their drawings, with only a small percentage achieving correct representations. Furthermore, significant errors and misunderstandings were identified in the students' drawings, highlighting the need for further attention and instruction in this area.
This study aims to understand middle and high school students' ecosystem knowledge including knowledge about the food web, food pyramid, and energy flow. The data were collected from 250 middle school and high school students. Students' drawings were used to collect data and coded as correct, wrong, or no answer. Then, students' wrong answers were re-analysed to reveal common problems students had in the ecosystem topic. Findings showed that participants were mainly unsuccessful in their drawings. Only 2% of them could correctly draw food webs, and 10% of the participants could draw food pyramids correctly. Among 250 students, only one student could successfully draw energy flow. Moreover, various problems were identified in students' drawings. For example, 94% of middle school students could not show fungi as decomposers in their food web drawing. Similarly, more than half of all students (67%) placed living organisms in the wrong trophic level when they drew a food pyramid. Likewise, only five high school students used the sun as the starting point of energy flow. Considering the findings, students' ecosystem knowledge is discussed and implications are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据