4.2 Article

Trauma-informed interactions within a trauma-informed homeless service provider: Staff and client perspectives

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcop.23102

关键词

homeless; homelessness; homeless services; service provision; trauma; trauma-informed; unhoused

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides practical insights for developing trauma-informed interaction strategies between service providers and participants in homeless service organizations. Through qualitative interviews with providers and participants, key factors in trauma-informed interactions were identified, and summaries of provider and participant perspectives were presented. The study describes the application of trauma-informed care in homeless service organizations, emphasizing the importance of supportive and positive interactions for promoting understanding, respect, and trust.
This study aims to provide practical insights for developing trauma-informed interaction strategies between service providers and participants in homeless service organizations (HSOs). Twelve providers and 17 participants were interviewed for a qualitative study on trauma-informed care (TIC) within an HSO. Thematic analysis revealed six themes regarding provider approaches to TIC interactions with participants: provide a sounding board, promote safety, foster understanding and respect, build relationships and trust, facilitate connection to services, and ensure flexibility in service provision. Participants noted three themes regarding their views of TIC interactions with providers: possess education and experience, build relationships and trust, and demonstrate supportive interpersonal styles. This study describes the application of TIC within an HSO, emphasizing the importance of supportive, positive interactions that promote understanding, respect, and trust. It highlights key factors in service provision. The findings expand our understanding of TIC implementation in HSOs and suggest areas for improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据