4.6 Article

Fenton-like reaction triggered chemical redox-cycling signal amplification for ultrasensitive fluorometric detection of H2O2 and glucose

期刊

ANALYST
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3an01682j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultrasensitive fluorescent biosensor for glucose detection is developed using a Fenton-like reaction triggered chemical redox-cycling signal amplification strategy. The strategy allows for self-sustaining chemical redox-cycling reaction and remarkable fluorescent enhancement, enabling the detection of glucose with high sensitivity.
An ultrasensitive fluorescent biosensor is reported for glucose detection based on a Fenton-like reaction triggered chemical redox-cycling signal amplification strategy. In this amplified strategy, Cu2+ oxidizes chemically o-phenylenediamine (OPD) to generate photosensitive 2,3-diaminophenazine (DAP) and Cu+/Cu-0. On the one hand, the generated Cu-0 catalyzes the oxidation of OPD. On the other hand, H2O2 reacts with Cu+ to produce hydroxyl radicals ((OH)-O-center dot) and Cu2+ through a Cu+-mediated Fenton-like reaction. The generated (OH)-O-center dot and recycled Cu2+ ions take turns oxidizing OPD to produce more photoactive DAP, triggering a self-sustaining chemical redox-cycling reaction and a remarkable fluorescent enhancement. It is worth mentioning that the cascade reaction did not stop until OPD molecules were completely consumed. Benefiting from H2O2-triggered chemical redox-cycling signal amplification, the strategy was exploited for the development of an ultrasensitive fluorescent biosensor for glucose determination. Glucose content monitoring was realized with a linear range from 1 nM to 1 mu M and a limit of detection of 0.3 nM. This study validates the practicability of the chemical redox-cycling signal amplification on the fluorescent bioanalysis of glucose in human serum samples. It is expected that the method offers new opportunities to develop ultrasensitive fluorescent analysis strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据