3.8 Article

The poetics of identity making: precarity and agency in Tahmima Anam's The Good Muslim

期刊

JOURNAL FOR CULTURAL RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14797585.2023.2291711

关键词

Bangladesh; violence; women; precariousness; The Good Muslim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the vulnerability and victimhood narratives faced by women in post-war Bangladesh and argues that Tahmima Anam's novel "The Good Muslim" transcends these narratives by creating a more nuanced image of women.
Bangladesh experienced a massive surge in humanitarian crises after the 1971 Liberation War due to the systematic use of violence at both public and private spheres. Fictional accounts of the post-conflict period depict women as subjected to institutionalised sexism and aggravated physical and mental violence. Critical studies on such narratives often reiterate a stereotypical and essentialising discourse surrounding women's identity, characterising them as helpless and passive victims of discrimination and exploitation. Drawing upon Judith Butler's notions of precarity and agency, we argue that the Bangladeshi-born British writer Tahmima Anam's The Good Muslim transcends victimhood narratives by creating a more nuanced image of woman as vulnerable victims and resisting subjects at the same time. The novel is preoccupied with notions of vulnerability, violence, religious zealotry, and family estrangement. The findings reveal that the precariousness of women in the post-war period is caused and aggravated by violence and oppression perpetrated at political, social, and religious spheres. Female characters like Maya and Piya are presented as empowered agents of transformation when it comes to vulnerable situations that render them as insignificant and precarious. The study concludes that the novel contests and alters the stereotypical representations of women embedded in normalising and hegemonic discourses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据