4.1 Article

What do remote outer island populations in the Pacific think about foreign aid? Insights from Mauke, Cook Islands

期刊

DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12759

关键词

aid; community development; Cook Islands; do no harm; local perspectives; outer islands; Pacific; remoteness; social cohesion; spatial development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to explore the experiences and perspectives of the population living in a remote Pacific outer island, Mauke in the Cook Islands, regarding the foreign aid they receive. By listening to and learning from local residents, this article seeks to address the spatial insensitivity in Pacific aid research and policy. The article derives policy implications for aid and development organizations working on Mauke and other remote outer islands in the Pacific.
MotivationPacific aid research has largely focused on national issues and social justice, rather than spatial justice and the development of remote outer islands. In particular, the perspectives of remote outer island populations on aid have not previously been assessed.PurposeThis study explores the experiences and views of the population of a remote Pacific outer island, Mauke in the Cook Islands, on the foreign aid they receive. By listening to and learning from local people living with aid on a remote outer island, this article seeks to address spatially insensitive Pacific aid research and policy. Based on these insights, the article derives policy implications for aid and development actors working on Mauke and other remote outer islands in the Pacific.Methods and approachEmploying a mixed-methods approach, this article draws on field research conducted on Mauke, involving in-depth semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey.FindingsThe people of Mauke are divided about whether the island should receive more or less aid. Those calling for more aid tend to be younger; they stress the need for infrastructure development. Those advocating for less aid tend to be older; they argue that aid has harmed Mauke by decreasing endogenous initiatives and creating social tensions, both of which reduce social cohesion among the remote island population.Policy implicationsRather than investing in community-based/-led development-doing development with the community, aid to remote Pacific outer islands should focus more on community development-with the aim of enhancing social cohesion among peripheral islands. Donors, governments, and development partners must carefully reflect on the degree to which their interventions may harm social cohesion and the endogenous development potential of remote outer island populations. These implications matter given the persistence of uncritical (mis)representations and (mis)conceptions of remote Pacific outer island populations as harmonious and mutually supportive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据