4.7 Review

Genetic Risk Scores Identify People at High Risk of Developing Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad704

关键词

diabetic kidney disease; genetic risk score; polygenic risk score

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review summarizes the existing evidence of genetic risk scores (GRSs) for predicting diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Most studies of high methodological quality reported a statistically significant association between GRS and at least one measure of DKD. GRSs can be used to identify people with diabetes at high risk of developing DKD.
Context Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Measures to prevent and treat DKD require better identification of patients most at risk. In this systematic review, we summarize the existing evidence of genetic risk scores (GRSs) and their utility for predicting DKD in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.Evidence Acquisition We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews in June 2022 to identify all existing and relevant literature. Main data items sought were study design, sample size, population, single nucleotide polymorphisms of interest, DKD-related outcomes, and relevant summary measures of result. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of studies.Evidence Synthesis We identified 400 citations of which 15 are included in this review. Overall, 7 studies had positive results, 5 had mixed results, and 3 had negative results. Most studies with the strongest methodological quality (n = 9) reported statistically significant and favourable findings of a GRS's association with at least 1 measure of DKD.Conclusion This systematic review presents evidence of the utility of GRSs to identify people with diabetes that are at high risk of developing DKD. In practice, a robust GRS could be used at the first clinical encounter with a person living with diabetes in order to stratify their risk of complications. Further prospective research is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据