4.7 Article

Damage analysis of deployable thin-walled composite shell structure during coiling up

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.111395

关键词

Damage analysis; Deployable thin-walled composite shell; Multi-scale modeling; Coiling up; Scanning electron microscope (SEM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the damage and failure behaviors of thin-walled coilable composite shells during snap-through and coiling up. Multiscale models are established to compute the mechanical properties and the results are verified through experiments. The dominant damage is found to be the failure of the matrix, and it can be relieved by increasing the hub diameter.
Thin-walled coilable composite shells have been successfully used in deployable space payloads due to their high storage efficiency and stiffness-to-weight ratio. However, in real-life applications the deployable composite shells requiring repeatable coiling up and deployment are easy to be damaged, and their damage or failure behaviors due to large deformations has been rarely studied. This paper aims to investigate their damage and failure behaviors during the snap through, equal-sense and opposite-sense coiling up. First, multiscale models are established to compute the mechanical properties of plain-woven fabrics and unidirectional prepregs with consideration of stiffness reduction of the composites. Then, damages of each ply within the thin-walled shell are studied during snap through and coiling up. Simultaneously, effects of hub diameter on the damage of the thin-walled shell were investigated, followed by experimental verification using strain gauges and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Simulation and experimental results show that the dominated damage of the thin walled shell is failure of matrix. The SEMs of the edge damaged show failures of both resin and carbon fibers. Tensile damages of matrix can be relieved as the increment of the hub diameter, and no obvious failure is observed at the hub diameter of 50 mm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据