4.2 Article

Kibria-Lukman estimator for the zero inflated negative binomial regression model: theory, simulation and applications

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2023.2286436

关键词

Biased estimator; Kibria-Lukman estimator; Liu estimator; Multicollinearity; Ridge estimator; Zero inflated negative binomial model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the parameter estimation for the zero-inflated negative binomial model in the presence of multicollinearity. A new estimator, called Kibria-Lukman estimator, is proposed along with some biasing parameters. The performance of the proposed estimator is compared with traditional biased estimators and found to be superior.
The zero inflated negative binomial model is an appropriate choice to model count response variables with excessive zeros and over-dispersion simultaneously. This article addresses the parameter estimation for the zero-inflated negative binomial model when there are many predictors and the problems of multicollinearity are present. Since, under multicollinearity, the widely used maximum likelihood estimator becomes unstable, this article proposes an alternative estimator, called Kibria-Lukman estimator for the zero inflated negative binomial model and provided some new biasing parameters. Then compared the performance of Kibria-Lukman estimator with some of the traditional biased estimators, that is, ridge and Liu estimators. The superiority of the proposed estimator is systematically scrutinized both theoretically and numerically. For numerical assessment, we conduct a Monte Carlo simulation study under different controlled factors. A numerical example is also applied to appraise the performance of proposed estimator. Based on the simulation and example results, we observed that the performance of the proposed estimator under different biasing parameters was better than that of the maximum likelihood estimator and other involved biased estimation methods when there exists a high but imperfect multicollinearity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据