4.6 Article

High performance resistive random access memory based on Ag/TiO2 Nanorods/FTO for image recognition applications

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2023.107998

关键词

TiO 2 nanorods; Resistance switching; Synapse; Image recognition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the electrical and synaptic properties of Ag/TiO2 nanorod/FTO-based RRAM devices, focusing on the impact of different seed layer thicknesses on nanorod thickness and RRAM performance. The devices show remarkable achievements in terms of endurance, self-compliance, and resistance switching ratio. The switching mechanism is attributed to space-charge-limited conduction resulting from electron trapping in oxygen vacancy traps. The devices also maintain stable synaptic properties even after undergoing multiple cycles of long-term potentiation and depression.
This study investigates the electrical and synaptic properties of Ag/TiO2 nanorod/FTO-based resistive random access memory (RRAM) devices, focusing on the impact of different seed layer thicknesses on nanorod thickness and RRAM performance. The devices exhibit notable achievements, including a high DC endurance of up to 150,000 cycles, a self-compliance function of 10-2 A, and a resistance switching ratio exceeding 100-fold. Notably, the device with a 3.5 mu m TiO2 nanorod thickness demonstrates exceptional stability. Analysis of the IV curve reveals that the switching mechanism is attributed to space-charge-limited conduction (SCLC) resulting from electron trapping in oxygen vacancy traps. Furthermore, the device maintains stable synaptic properties even after undergoing 20 cycles of long-term potentiation and depression. When employed in the context of artificial neural networks for image recognition, these devices attain high accuracy rates in recognizing handwritten digits, achieving approximately 90% accuracy for 8 x 8 pixel images and approximately 88% for 28 x 28 pixel images, demonstrating their suitability for practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据