4.5 Article

Maximizing the profit of omnichannel closed-loop supply chains with mean-variance criteria

期刊

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.109030

关键词

Omnichannel retailing; Game analysis; Mean-variance; System operations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study constructs two optimization models for the omnichannel closed-loop supply chain by leveraging the combined power of leader-follower game and mean-variance theories. The focus is on analyzing the performance of manufacturers who distribute products through physical stores. The results show that the risk-averse attitude of the physical store has a positive impact on the overall system profitability, but if the introduced physical store belongs to another firm, total profit experiences a decline.
The maximization of profitability stands as a paramount objective within supply chains. The conventional approach involves implementing an omnichannel retailing strategy to integrate diverse sales channels. However, such implementation often introduces uncertainty in product pricing and recycling, undermining the system's robustness. In this study, we leverage the combined power of leader-follower game and mean-variance theories to construct two opti-mization models for the omnichannel closed-loop supply chain. Specifically, our focus lies in analyzing the performance of manufacturers who distribute products through physical stores. By meticulously considering the risk aversion attribute inherent in the supply chain, we derive closed-form solutions for the optimal approach. The main results show the positive impact of a risk-averse attitude exhibited by the physical store on the overall system profitability. However, if the introduced physical store belongs to another firm, then total profit experiences a decline. To further substantiate our claims, we conduct a comprehensive numerical analysis to show the performance of our optimization models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据