4.8 Article

Bifunctional Small Molecules That Induce Nuclear Localization and Targeted Transcriptional Regulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 145, 期 48, 页码 26028-26037

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c06179

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abnormal localization of proteins in cells is closely related to the development of various diseases. Researchers have designed bifunctional compounds to regulate protein localization and transport. The results show potential applications of this method in cancer treatment and the ability to rewiring cell circuitry.
The aberrant localization of proteins in cells is a key factor in the development of various diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disease. To better understand and potentially manipulate protein localization for therapeutic purposes, we engineered bifunctional compounds that bind to proteins in separate cellular compartments. We show these compounds induce nuclear import of cytosolic cargoes, using nuclear-localized BRD4 as a carrier for co-import and nuclear trapping of cytosolic proteins. We use this system to calculate kinetic constants for passive diffusion across the nuclear pore and demonstrate single-cell heterogeneity in response to these bifunctional molecules with cells requiring high carrier to cargo expression for complete import. We also observe incorporation of cargo into BRD4-containing condensates. Proteins shown to be substrates for nuclear transport include oncogenic mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1c) and mutant PI3K catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CAE545K), suggesting potential applications to cancer treatment. In addition, we demonstrate that chemically induced localization of BRD4 to cytosolic-localized DNA-binding proteins, namely, IRF1 with a nuclear export signal, induces target gene expression. These results suggest that induced localization of proteins with bifunctional molecules enables the rewiring of cell circuitry, with significant implications for disease therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据