4.4 Article

Febuxostat ameliorates APAP-induced acute liver injury by activating Keap1/Nrf2 and inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB p65 pathways

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/15353702231211862

关键词

Febuxostat; acetaminophen; liver injury; Keap1/Nrf2 pathway; TLR4/NF-kappa B p65 pathway; oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that febuxostat has a significant improvement effect on acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Febuxostat can reduce liver indicators in serum, inhibit inflammation and oxidative responses, and protect the liver by activating the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway and inhibiting the TLR4/NF-kappa B p65 pathway. In addition, febuxostat can also prevent acetaminophen-induced liver injury.
Excessive acetaminophen (APAP) application is a major cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Febuxostat (Feb), a drug for reducing uric acid (UA) levels, was demonstrated to relieve hepatic inflammation and reverse organ functions. However, the effect of Feb on APAP-induced DILI and its mechanisms have not been fully explored. In this study, Feb (10 mg/kg) was given to mice by gavage 1 h after APAP (300 mg/kg, i.g.) induction. Serum and liver samples were collected 12 or 3 h after APAP challenge. Feb treatment was found to remarkably improve APAP-induced DILI, as evidenced by reduced serum ALT, AST and UA levels, pathomorphology, inflammatory, and oxidative responses. Consistently, treatment with Feb also reduced the cell injury induced by APAP in LO2 cells. Mechanistically, Feb induced GPX4 expression, activated the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway, and inhibited the TLR4/NF-kappa B p65 pathway. Feb also inhibited glutathione (GSH) depletion and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation in the early injury phase. Notably, pretreatment with Feb for 3 days also revealed preventive effects against APAP-induced DILI in mice. Overall, our data revealed a potential health impact of Feb on APAP-mediated DILI in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that Feb might be a potential candidate for treating DILI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据