4.7 Article

Transport causality knowledge-guided GCN for propagated delay prediction in airport delay propagation networks

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122426

关键词

Transport causality; Graph convolutional network (GCN); Propagated delay prediction; Airport delay propagation network (ADPN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flight delays are a worldwide challenge that significantly affects the safety and efficiency of air transportation systems. This study proposes a transport causality knowledge-guided extended graph convolutional network framework to address the crucial issues in propagated delay prediction. By developing a causality knowledge-guided airport delay propagation network and utilizing a causality-embedded adjacency matrix for delay prediction, the proposed method significantly improves the prediction performance.
Flight delays pose a worldwide challenge that significantly affect the safety and efficiency of air transportation systems. However, propagated delay prediction, as well as its causality among airport delay propagation net-works, has not considered some crucial issues regarding spatiotemporal dependence and propagation relation-ships. Thus, this study proposes a transport causality knowledge-guided extended graph convolutional network (GCN) framework to tackle these issues. In particular, a causality knowledge-guided airport delay propagation network (ADPN) is developed using the second modified transfer entropy (SMTE) principle. Furthermore, a causality-embedded adjacency matrix is utilized by an extended GCN for propagated delay prediction. Comprehensive validations and results indicate that the proposed method benefits significantly from the cau-sality knowledge, and increases the prediction performances up to 15.51%. Thus, transport causality is signifi-cant and efficient for understanding propagated delay features and airport delay propagation network characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据