4.2 Article

Ischemic Stroke with Positive Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Bloom Syndrome: A Case Report

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107490

关键词

Bloom syndrome; Antiphospholipid antibodies; Ischemic stroke; Hypercoagulable state; Case report

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This case report describes a patient with Bloom syndrome who developed acute cerebral infarction along with elevated antiphospholipid antibodies, suggesting a possible association between immune and coagulation abnormalities caused by Bloom syndrome and the development of acute cerebral infarction.
Objective: Bloom syndrome is a chromosomal breakage disorder associated with immune deficiency, characterized by short stature, predisposition to early-onset cancer, and immune defects. Currently, there have been no reports of acute cerebral infarction in patients with Bloom syndrome. Here, we report a case of Bloom syndrome complicated by elevated antiphospholipid antibodies and acute cerebral infarction. Materials and Methods: A 23year-old male with a known genetic diagnosis of Bloom syndrome was admitted to the Respiratory Department due to pulmonary aspergillosis. The patient experienced sudden dizziness, and subsequent cranial MRI revealed a newly developed infarction in the right cerebellar hemisphere. Results: Six days later, the patient presented with sudden right visual field loss, and a repeat cranial MRI showed new infarctions in the left occipital and temporal lobes. Positive lupus anticoagulant and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time suggested elevated antiphospholipid antibodies causing thrombus formation. Unfortunately, anticoagulant treatment was not administered due to recurrent hemoptysis. Conclusion: This study reports the first case of a Bloom syndrome patient with elevated antiphospholipid antibodies and acute cerebral infarction, suggesting that the immune and coagulation abnormalities caused by Bloom syndrome may contribute to the development of acute cerebral infarction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据