4.8 Article

Customer experience quality with social robots: Does trust matter?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123032

关键词

Customer equity drivers; Customer experience; Social robots; Customer trust; Brand equity; Value equity; Artificial neural networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationships among customer equity drivers, trust in social robots, and trust in service providers. The findings show that customer equity drivers influence trust in service providers, and only brand and relationship equity influence trust in social robots. Trust in service providers mediates the relationship between customer equity drivers and customer experience quality.
Although service providers increasingly adopt social robots, much remains to be learned about what influences customers' experiences with robots. To address this issue, this study investigates the relationships among customer equity drivers (i.e., value equity, brand equity and relationship equity), trust in social robots, and trust in service providers. Specifically, we hypothesize that customer equity drivers influence trust in social robots and trust in service providers. We also propose that customer equity drivers influence customer experience quality in the context of social robots and that trust in social robots and trust in service providers mediate these relationships. The study used a two-stage hybrid partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM)artificial neural network (ANN) analysis to examine the proposed relationships. Findings show that while all the customer equity drivers influence trust in service providers, only brand and relationship equity influence trust in social robots. Results also suggest that trust in service providers mediates the relationship between customer equity drivers and customer experience quality. In addition, we find that consumers' trust in service providers helps generate trust in social robots. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据